What is the test for determining whether the court considered all relevant factors in determining a plaintiff's claim?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Whitfield, F074000 (Cal. App. 2019):
In the absence of an affirmative record to the contrary, the court is presumed to have considered all relevant factors. (People v. Myers (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 305, 310.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff's financial condition is to be considered a factor in determining whether to award punitive damages? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether an injury arising out of employment is a contributory factor in determining whether a claim can be made under section 3600 of the California Labor Code? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered the relevant factors in determining whether to grant a conditional discharge? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a trial court considered the relevant factors in a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered relevant factors in determining whether to grant a conditional discharge? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been successful in their claim that the trial court considered some facts but not other facts? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a court to determine whether a plaintiff has been successful on a motion of appeal against a finding that the respondent has been found to have failed to exercise his discretion in weighing the relevant factors? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court has considered all of the relevant factors under section 389 (b) of the California Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a physician is qualified to determine whether a plaintiff has a valid claim for medical malpractice? (California, United States of America)
