What is the test for determining whether a trial court considered the relevant factors in a finding of not guilty?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Snyder, B265391 (Cal. App. 2016):
The trial court's comments at the hearing indicate it thoughtfully considered the relevant factors. "Where the record demonstrates that the trial court balanced the relevant facts and reached an impartial decision in conformity with the spirit of the law, we shall affirm the trial court's ruling . . . ." (People v.
Page 21
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether the court considered all relevant factors in determining a plaintiff's claim? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered relevant factors in determining whether to grant a conditional discharge? (California, United States of America)
When a trial court properly finds that S.D's vulnerability as an aggravating factor in determining the appropriate sentence for perjury, can defense counsel object to the additional factor of suborning perjury? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal in determining whether a defendant received a fair trial due to a series of trial errors? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered the relevant factors in determining whether to grant a conditional discharge? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court has considered all of the relevant factors under section 389 (b) of the California Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court have any authority to exercise its discretion in determining whether an error was made in a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a court to determine whether a plaintiff has been successful on a motion of appeal against a finding that the respondent has been found to have failed to exercise his discretion in weighing the relevant factors? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff's financial condition is to be considered a factor in determining whether to award punitive damages? (California, United States of America)
