When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence support his criminal conviction, what is the standard of review used by this court?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Batchelor, 178 Cal.Rptr.3d 28, 229 Cal.App.4th 1102 (Cal. App. 2014):

When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his criminal conviction, this court review[s] the entire record in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine whether it contains substantial evidence--that is, evidence that is reasonable, credible, and of

[178 Cal.Rptr.3d 35]

solid value--from which a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a

[229 Cal.App.4th 1109]

reasonable doubt. (People v. Castaneda (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1292, 1322, 127 Cal.Rptr.3d 200, 254 P.3d 249.)

Other Questions


When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, what is the standard of review required by the California Court of Appeal to determine whether the evidence is sufficient? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, what is the standard of review used by this court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction of a convicted rapist, does the court have to review the evidence in the context of section 1118.1? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, how does the Court of Appeal review the whole record? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review on appeal when a defendant challenges the sufficiency of evidence to support his burglary conviction? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the entire record? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review on appeal when a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, how does the Court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.