When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction of a convicted rapist, does the court have to review the evidence in the context of section 1118.1?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Terrell, B290904 (Cal. App. 2020):
courts when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a conviction. (People v. Cole (2004) 33 Cal.4th 1158, 1212-1213.) On appeal we independently review a trial court's denial of a section 1118.1 motion. (People v. Magallanes (2009) 173 Cal.App.4th 529, 533.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When reviewing for the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, how does the Court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for review of a conviction for assault and robbery, in what circumstances will the Court uphold the conviction of defendant as a result of insufficient evidence to support the judgment? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review used in determining whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction or support a denial of a section 1118.1 motion? (California, United States of America)
