California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Nosal-Tabor v. Sharp Chula Vista Med. Ctr., 191 Cal.Rptr.3d 651, 239 Cal.App.4th 1224 (Cal. App. 2015):
terminated the plaintiff's employment, (3) the termination was substantially motivated by a violation of public policy, and (4) the discharge caused the plaintiff harm. (Yau v. Allen (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 144, 154, 176 Cal.Rptr.3d 824.) It is well established that a termination premised on an employee's refusal to violate either a statute or an administrative regulation may support a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. (See
[191 Cal.Rptr.3d 660]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.