California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Fitzgerald v. IP Mobilenet, Inc., G041003 (Cal. App. 1/4/2010), G041003. (Cal. App. 2010):
That statute declares, "An employer may not retaliate against an employee for refusing to participate in an activity that would result in a violation of state or federal statute, or a violation or noncompliance with a state or federal rule or regulation." Retaliation claims under Labor Code section 1102.5 "require that (1) the plaintiff establish a prima facie case of retaliation, (2) the defendant provide a legitimate, nonretaliatory explanation for its acts, and (3) the plaintiff show this explanation is merely a pretext for the retaliation. [Citations.]" (Patten v. Grant Joint Union High School Dist. (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1378, 1384 [applying same test in whistleblowing action under Lab. Code, 1102.5, subd. (b)].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.