What is the test for unanimity in determining whether a defendant committed two separate crimes at the same time?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Neal, C075144 (Cal. App. 2017):

When the evidence suggests more than one discrete crime, either the prosecution must elect among the crimes, or the trial court must instruct the jury that it must unanimously agree that the defendant committed the same criminal act. (Russo, supra, 25 Cal.4th at p. 1132.) The unanimity instruction must be given sua sponte, even if, like here, the defendant does not request the instruction. (People v. Riel (2000) 22 Cal.4th 1153, 1199.)

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a crime committed by the same person as a separate crime is separate and involved separate objectives? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there were two crimes committed at the same time, one committed with the same intent and objectives, and the other committed with different intentions and objectives? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury rely on expert testimony about gang culture and habits to determine whether a crime committed by a defendant was committed for the benefit of a gang? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have time to reflect before committing each criminal act, such that each one can be considered a separate crime subject to separate punishment? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant who committed a crime under a different sentencing scheme that existed at the time he committed the crime be sentenced to a different sentence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has committed multiple crimes at the same time? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a defendant's mental state was not a factor in determining whether they had committed a sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's intent or mental state is a factor in determining whether they intended to commit an act of violence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.