What is the test for the purpose of determining whether a plaintiff has been deprived of access to a hearing by the Court?

deprivation. ( Connecticut v. Doehr (1991) 501 U.S. 1, 10, [111 S.Ct. 2105, 2112, 115 L.Ed.2d 1, 13].) That inquiry requires a court to balance (1) the private interest that will be affected by the official action; (2) the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and (3) the government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail. ( Mathews v. Eldridge, supra, 424 U.S. at p. 335, 96 S.Ct. at p. 903, [47 L.Ed.2d at p. 33] ; Reardon v. United States (1st Cir.1991) 947 F.2d 1509, 1518 ( Reardon ).) We apply the Mathews test to the facts alleged here.