What is the test for the crime of conspiracy to commit second-degree murder?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Cortez, 47 Cal.App.4th 828, 54 Cal.Rptr.2d 841 (Cal. App. 1996):

Except for felony-murder, "first degree murder is distinguished from second degree [express malice] murder by the presence or absence of premeditation and deliberation." (People v. Van Ronk (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 818, 822, 217 Cal.Rptr. 581; see also CALJIC No. 8.30 [defining unpremeditated murder of the second degree].) It follows that the crime of conspiracy to commit second degree murder contemplates, at most, the "narrow range of cases ... in which conspirators formed an agreement to kill but made that agreement without deliberation and premeditation." (See People v. Swain, supra, 12 Cal.4th at p. 625, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 390, 909 P.2d 994 (conc. opn. of Kennard, J.).) Swain suggests this range does not exist.

Other Questions


When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
In a conspiracy case, under section 654 of the California Criminal Code, is there separate punishment for conspiracy to commit several crimes and for the underlying crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is a conspiracy to commit assault with a firearm a lesser included crime of conspiracy to murder? (California, United States of America)
Does the felony-murder rule apply to a murder case where the accused committed a felony before the crime was committed? (California, United States of America)
Can the actual killer be held liable as an accessory on the theory that he encouraged the murder victim to commit the crime after he had committed the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of conspiracy to commit crimes if they withdrew from the conspiracy before any overt act was committed? (California, United States of America)
Does a co-conspirator of a robbery and/or conspiracy to commit a murder in the perpetration of the crime have to be held responsible for the crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.