What is the test for requiring expert testimony in a medical malpractice case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Arato v. Avedon, 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 169, 13 Cal.App.4th 1325 (Cal. App. 1992):

Also, expert testimony is not necessary where negligence is demonstrated by facts which can be evaluated by resort to common knowledge. (See Ales v. Ryan (1936) 8 Cal.2d 82, 100, 64 P.2d 409.)

Other Questions


In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for requiring expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for requiring expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
In a medical malpractice case, in what circumstances will a jury accept that a doctor's expert testimony is not required? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for requiring an expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the case law on abuse of expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
In a medical malpractice case, is a doctor required to provide expert testimony on the issue of contributory negligence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissibility of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated questions about the depth or scope of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.