What is the test for "relevant evidence" in a personal injury case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Magee, B301576 (Cal. App. 2020):
"No evidence is admissible except relevant evidence." ( 350.) Evidence is relevant if it has "any tendency in reason to prove or disprove any disputed fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action." ( 210.) The trial court has an obligation to exclude evidence that does not meet this standard. (People v. Gutierrez, supra, 45 Cal.4th at p. 828.)
Page 17
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is relevant evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is relevant evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, can a plaintiff hire an attorney to prosecute the personal injury suit? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for "relevant evidence" in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is relevant evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence in the context of evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What are some examples of high-profile personal injury cases involving personal injury? (California, United States of America)
What is relevant evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of Evidence Code section 664 of the California Evidence Code on the burden of proof in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
