California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Dietz, A140421 (Cal. App. 2015):
Only relevant evidence is admissible at trial. (Evid. Code, 350.) "Relevant evidence" is statutorily defined as evidence "having any tendency in reason to prove or disprove a disputed fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action." (Evid. Code, 210.) Under Evidence Code section 352, relevant evidence may be excluded when "its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will (a) necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury." We review a trial court's ruling regarding relevance and admissibility under Evidence Code section 352 for abuse of discretion. (People v. Merriman (2014) 60 Cal.4th 1, 74.) Under this deferential standard, we will not reverse "unless it is shown ' "the trial court exercised its discretion in an arbitrary, capricious, or patently absurd manner that resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice." [Citation.]' " (Ibid.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.