California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. O'Malley, 199 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 365 P.3d 790, 62 Cal.4th 944 (Cal. 2016):
is but one form of circumstantial evidence that is relevant, but not necessarily dispositive, on the issue of intentional discrimination." (People v. Lenix, supra, 44 Cal.4th at p. 622, 80 Cal.Rptr.3d 98, 187 P.3d 946.) Where, as here, the comparative analysis was not made at trial, "the prosecutor generally has not provided, and was not asked to
[199 Cal.Rptr.3d 33]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.