The following excerpt is from Motors Liquidation Co. v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Motors Liquidation Co.), Case No. 09-00504 (MG), Case No. 09-50026 (MG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016):
interlocutory order is informed by the law-of-the-case doctrine, which provides that when a court has ruled on an issue, that decision should generally be adhered to by that court in subsequent stages in the same case. Uccio, 940 F.2d at 758. The decision whether or not to apply law-of-the-case is, in turn, informed principally by the concern that disregard of an earlier ruling not be allowed to prejudice the party seeking the benefit of the doctrine. Id.; see also Zdonok v. Glidden Co., 327 F.2d 944, 953 (2d Cir. 1964) (Friendly, J.) (stating that the doctrine of the law of the case is addressed to the court's "good sense").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.