California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Roberts, B279633 (Cal. App. 2017):
The trial court as well has "great latitude in . . . limiting the scope of closing summations. . . . [It] may ensure that argument does not stray unduly from the mark, or otherwise impede the fair and orderly conduct of the trial. In all these respects [the trial judge] must have broad discretion." (Herring v. New York (1975) 422 U.S. 853, 862 (Herring).) The trial judge's limitations on closing argument are reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard. (People v. Edwards (2013) 57 Cal.4th 658, 743.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.