Does the trial court abuse its discretion when it limited defense counsel's closing argument?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Milton, B282447 (Cal. App. 2018):

Thus, we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it limited defense counsel's closing argument. As a result, we need not and do not reach defendant's arguments that the alleged error violated his constitutional rights. " 'No separate constitutional discussion is required, or provided, when rejection of a claim on the merits necessarily leads to rejection of any constitutional theory or "gloss" raised for the first time here.' " (People v. Solomon (2010) 49 Cal.4th 792, 811, fn. 8 (Solomon).)

Page 20

Other Questions


In what circumstances will a trial court limit defense counsel's closing argument for abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a trial court limit defense counsel's closing argument for abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, in what circumstances would the jury have considered a defense counsel's closing argument that the prosecutor's rebuttal to the closing argument had the trial court sustained an objection? (California, United States of America)
Does a defense counsel who objected to the prosecutor's closing argument during closing argument at a civil trial have any right to an objection? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's right to counsel violated when the trial court severely limits the defense's closing argument? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the trial court bar defense counsel from making references to well-known murderers in closing arguments? (California, United States of America)
Does trial counsel shirk his constitutional responsibility to provide competent counsel by failing to ask the court to instruct on a bogus self-defense defense? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion in refusing to question defense counsel's allusions to the possibility that others had a motive to commit the crimes against Treto? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.