What is the test for giving a statement under the Miranda Rule?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Gray, F070151 (Cal. App. 2016):
After being advised of the warnings pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436, defendant agreed to give a statement and confirmed his nickname was "Gucci." Defendant denied any involvement in the robbery and said he had never been to the jewelry store. The police advised defendant that his fingerprints were found there. Defendant did not respond to that information and simply said that he loved his children.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a temporary investigative detention trigger the obligation of a police officer to give a Miranda under the Miranda rule? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda Statement? (California, United States of America)
Does the use of the Miranda Miranda Miranda Rule apply to information that is not in the context of criminal activity? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant exclude a statement made by the Defendant under the Miranda Rule? (California, United States of America)
Under what procedural safeguards under the Miranda Miranda, or otherwise, does a suspect have to be warned that he has a right to remain silent, that any statement he makes may be used as evidence against him? (California, United States of America)
Does a statement by an appellate court of a rule of law necessary to the decision of the case on appeal conclusively establish that rule? (California, United States of America)
Does an undercover officer who poses as a fellow inmate need to give a Miranda warning to an inmate before asking questions that may elicit incriminating statements from the suspect? (California, United States of America)
Is counsel incompetent in denying a defendant's motion to exclude his statements to the police in violation of Miranda v. Miranda? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a trial court's decision on the Miranda issue, does the court have to agree that a statement was obtained in violation of the Miranda Act? (California, United States of America)
Does a suspect who has received and understood the Miranda warning, and has not invoked his Miranda rights, waives his right to remain silent by making an uncoerced statement to the police? (California, United States of America)
