What is the test for finding no prosecutorial misconduct or abuse of discretion in a motion for a new trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Soy, B253692 (Cal. App. 2015):

Accordingly, because there is no reasonable basis to conclude the prosecutor's argument improperly influenced the jury's ultimate verdict, defendants have not established that the trial court's finding of no prosecutorial misconduct and its denial of the new trial motion constituted either an abuse of discretion or a denial of defendants' constitutional rights. We conclude that the prosecutor's time calculations were not a deceptive or reprehensible method nor did they constitute egregiously intemperate conduct so as to render the trial fundamentally unfair. (See People v. Bordelon (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 1311, 1323-1324.)

Other Questions


What is the test for abuse of abuse of power in the context of a motion to overturn a finding that the trial court abused power on the Pitchess motion? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion under the first two grounds? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to dismiss one or both of appellant's prior strike convictions, can appellant appeal against the finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion in the context of a motion to review the decision of a trial court denying a defendant's motion to exclude victim impact evidence and uncharged misconduct in the case of Romero? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, does the trial judge abuse his discretion in denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of abuse of authority in denying a motion for a new trial motion based on newly discovered evidence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct based on Juror misconduct, what is the effect of the finding on the credibility of the jury? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.