What is the test for excluding an expert's testimony?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Ludwig v. Paraiso, B259928 (Cal. App. 2016):

the trial court errs in excluding an expert's testimony, "the error is not reversible unless it is reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the appellant would have been reached without the error." (Maatuk v. Guttman (2009) 173 Cal.App.4th 1191, 1199.)

1. The Exclusion of Solomon and Stein Was Harmless

Other Questions


In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that expert testimony may be available at trial require defense counsel to consult the experts or present their testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
Can counsel consult with a medical expert and determine no favorable testimony would result if the expert was called as a witness? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for excluding expert testimony from a trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony from a trial? (California, United States of America)
How have expert testimony been excluded from the trial jury in a murder case? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between testimony by an expert and opinion by a non-expert? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
Can an expert's testimony be excluded from a jury trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.