What is the legal test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mondine, F069986 (Cal. App. 2016):

"A trial court's decision to admit or exclude expert testimony is reviewed for abuse of discretion. [Citation.]" (People v. Pearson (2013) 56 Cal.4th 393, 443.) Under that standard, we will not disturb the trial court's decision unless it was arbitrary, capricious, or patently absurd resulting in a manifest miscarriage of justice. (People v. Rodriguez (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1, 9-10.)

Other Questions


In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that expert testimony may be available at trial require defense counsel to consult the experts or present their testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony from a trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for admitting expert opinion testimony in a murder trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for admitting expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.