The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Kostoff, 585 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1978):
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, all of the defendants reportedly met several times together and discussed "cleaning" credit records at several local watering holes. The government need not show direct contact or explicit agreement between the defendants. It is sufficient to show that each defendant knew or had a reason to know of the scope of the conspiracy and that each defendant had reason to believe that their own benefits were dependent upon the success of the entire venture. United States v. Perry, 550 F.2d 524, 528-29 (9th Cir. 1977). We conclude that the government satisfied this test.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.