How has the US Supreme Court interpreted the instruction that a finding of conspiracy against a defendant does not mandate acquittal of a defendant where there is evidence of other conspiracies?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Gleason, 616 F.2d 2 (2nd Cir. 1980):
8 This instruction was more favorable to the defendants than the law required, since it is subject to the qualification that where there is proof of the conspiracy charged in an indictment, a finding of other conspiracies would not mandate acquittal. United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832, 96 S.Ct. 54, 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a bankruptcy court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a defendant who communicates well in English entitled to an interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted a finding that a defendant is liable for misconduct in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of a federal district court's finding that a grand jury indicted a defendant in a criminal case based on a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the court treated the argument that the court improperly attributed more weight to circumstantial evidence than to direct evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the US Supreme Court consider whether the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court has any authority or authority to issue an opinion in the context of judicial review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a defendant argues there is insufficient evidence to convict him of a charge of sexual assault, how does the court view the evidence against him? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
