What is the test for establishing a trier of fact?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Macedo, C075324 (Cal. App. 2015):
within the provenance of the trier of fact. (People v. Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 162.) "[U]nless the testimony is physically impossible or inherently improbable, testimony of a single witness is sufficient to support a conviction." (People v. Young (2005) 34 Cal.4th 1149, 1181.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for establishing that the evidence is fully developed before the trier of fact? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a reasonable trier of fact in a retaliation action? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a relationship between permissively inferred fact and proven fact? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that appellant was found incompetent after the trial not establish that he was incompetent during the trial, but does not establish he was competent at the time of trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, what is the test for assuming that every fact the trier of fact could reasonably deduce from the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that a greater number of aggravating than mitigating circumstances may be established in aggravating circumstances determine whether a lower term is justified? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances has consent been inferred from a failure to object on a transcript of a preliminary hearing where a defendant submitted on the information to the trier of fact's consideration of a nonincluded offense? (California, United States of America)
