What is the test for establishing a finding of fact?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Payne v. White House Properties, Inc., 112 Cal.App.3d 465, 169 Cal.Rptr. 373 (Cal. App. 1980):

When a finding of fact is challenged on the ground and there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, "the power of an appellate court begins and ends with the determination as to whether there is any substantial evidence, contradicted or uncontradicted, which will support the finding of fact." (Grainger v. Antoyan (1957) 48 Cal.2d 805, 807, 313 P.2d 848.)

Other Questions


What is the test for establishing that a permit application is based upon the necessary findings and the substantial evidence supporting the findings? (California, United States of America)
How have appellate courts dealt with challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of a finding of fact? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a finding of fact by a jury? (California, United States of America)
Can a finding of guilty of murder be reconciled with a finding that the facts of the crime were proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a finding or finding in a personal injury case will not be set aside on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a relationship between permissively inferred fact and proven fact? (California, United States of America)
What findings must a trial court make to satisfy the "detailed findings of fact" requirement in subdivision (a)(2) of section 6305 of the California Child Protection Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a finding of fact in a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
What findings must a trial court make to satisfy the "detailed findings of fact" requirement in subdivision (a)(2) of section 6305 of the California Child Protection Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that appellant was found incompetent after the trial not establish that he was incompetent during the trial, but does not establish he was competent at the time of trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.