What is the test for determining whether an unintended crime was a natural and probable consequence of the target crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Montoya, C082283 (Cal. App. 2019):

"To be sure, whether an unintended crime was the independent product of the perpetrator's mind outside of, or foreign to, the common design may, if shown by the evidence, become relevant to the question whether that crime was a natural and probable consequence of the target crime. In a given case, a criminal defendant may argue to the jury that the nontarget crime was the perpetrator's independent idea unrelated to the common plan, and thus was not reasonably foreseeable and not a natural and probable consequence of the target crime. But that would be a factual issue for the jury to resolve [citation], not a separate legal requirement." (People v. Smith, supra, 60 Cal.4th at p. 617.)

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether an unintended crime was a natural and probable consequence of the common design? (California, United States of America)
What is the nature and probable consequences of the natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the target crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether an aider and abettor is liable for any other crime that was a "natural and probable consequence" of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Is a charged crime a natural and probable consequence of the target crime if the charged crime was reasonably foreseeable? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining derivative accomplice liability for natural and probable consequences of the target crime? (California, United States of America)
Can an aider and abettor be held criminally responsible for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the target crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there was a foreseeable crime that was a natural and probable consequence of kidnapping? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between aiding and abettor culpability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine for a nontarget, or unintended, offense committed in the course of committing a target crime? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be charged with the target crime of robbery as a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.