The following excerpt is from Smith v. Salt River Project Agr. Imp. and Power Dist., 109 F.3d 586, 1997 WL 129035 (9th Cir. 1997):
In determining whether a challenged voting practice violates 2, the district court must examine the totality of the circumstances and "determine, based 'upon a searching practical evaluation of the past and present reality,'... whether the political process is equally open to minority voters." Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30, 79, 106 S.Ct. 2752, 2781, 92 L.Ed.2d 25 (1986) (citation omitted). This examination is intensely fact-based and localized. Id. (citing Rogers v. Lodge, 458 U.S. 613, 621, 102 S.Ct. 3272, 3277-78, 73 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1982)). Deferring to the district court's superior fact-finding capabilities, we review only for clear error its ultimate finding of no 2 violation. Id. at 78-79, 106 S.Ct. at 2780-81.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.