What is the test for determining the meaning of a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Cardenas v. M. Fanaian, D.D.S., Inc., 15 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10, 194 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 2015 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11, 240 Cal.App.4th 1167, 40 IER Cases 1168 (Cal. App. 2015):

The starting point for ascertaining legislative intent always begins with the plain language of the statute. Courts are obligated to ascribe the ordinary and usual meaning to statutory language (People v. Watson (2007) 42 Cal.4th 822, 828, 68 Cal.Rptr.3d 769, 171 P.3d 1101;

[194 Cal.Rptr.3d 11]

Other Questions


What is the test for determining the meaning of a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure contains two distinct meanings? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining the meaning of a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
Is section 1161a(b) of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure sufficient to compel a judge to interpret the meaning of the law in its entirety? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure requiring a cap on the amount of cannabis that can be confiscated? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any authority or authority to amend or amend a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure to make it easier for a plaintiff to sue for damages? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. section 186. 22) Violate Due Process? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.