What is the test for classifying an offence as a criminal offence from the date of the crime committed as a watershed?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Spears, 40 Cal.App.4th 1683, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 634 (Cal. App. 1995):
"... Fixing the day the offense was committed as the watershed results in an entirely reasonable classification and does not deny equal protection to those whose offenses predate [the legislative change]." (People v. Superior Court (Gonzales) (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 134, 143, 144 Cal.Rptr. 89.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a criminal offence punishable by multiple convictions for multiple offences punishable by the same criminal offence against the same defendant concurrent with one criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
Is there a consequence that if a gang member is convicted of a criminal offence by virtue of his or her actions, such that the crime proceeds to a criminal enterprise and the criminal damage caused by the crime? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is accused of a sexual offence in a criminal action in which he is also accused of another sexual offence, is evidence of his disposition to commit such crimes considered to be inadmissible under California Evidence Code section 1108? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(1) of the California Criminal Code apply to a person convicted of a criminal street crime committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
Does a new criminal conviction for a charge of possession of a drug with intent to commit a criminal offence violate subdivision (e) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
