The following excerpt is from Hatheway v. Secretary of Army, 641 F.2d 1376 (9th Cir. 1981):
Though "(t)he courts have not designated homosexuals a 'suspect' or 'quais-suspect' classification so as to require more exacting scrutiny," DeSantis v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co., Inc., 608 F.2d 327, 333 (9th Cir. 1979), heightened scrutiny is independently required where a classification penalizes the exercise of a fundamental right. See Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, 634, 89 S.Ct. 1322, 1331, 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969). It does so here.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.