What is the test for an independent review of a court's interpretation of the instruments creating an easement where the evidence is not disputed?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Emcke v. Holst, B264516 (Cal. App. 2016):
We independently review a trial court's interpretation of the instruments creating an easement where, like the case before us, the evidence is not disputed. (City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior Court (1996) 13 Cal.4th 232, 238.)
2. Mansard had no right to grant easements over the Road
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing for the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a lower court's ruling for abuse of power, does the court review the evidence or evaluate the credibility of witnesses? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction of a convicted rapist, does the court have to review the evidence in the context of section 1118.1? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, how does the Court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court have to accept the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court ruling that resolves conflicts in the evidence entitled to greater deference from a reviewing court than a similar finding in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
