California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Tulare Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. Roy B. (In re Charlotte B.), F063705 (Cal. App. 2012):
To conclude there was an abuse of discretion, the proof offered must be uncontradicted and unimpeached so that discretion could be exercised only in one way, compelling a finding in favor of the appellant as a matter of law. (Roesch v. De Mota (1944) 24 Cal.2d 563, 570-571; In re I.W. (2009) 180 Cal.App.4th 1517, 1528.) Based on our review of the record, we conclude the juvenile court properly exercised its discretion in rejecting father's argument.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.