What is the test for admitting or denying false statements by a defendant in a criminal case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Kimble, 244 Cal.Rptr. 148, 44 Cal.3d 480, 749 P.2d 803 (Cal. 1988):

We begin with the established California precedent. In People v. Cole (1903) 141 Cal. 88, 74 P. 547, the defendant, a shipping clerk and salesman employed by a furniture store, was accused of improperly selling some of the store's carpets and keeping the proceeds of the sale. When charged with the crime, he denied delivering the carpets in question to anyone, and denied even knowing the person who had purchased the goods. The court admitted evidence of these statements at trial, and on appeal defendant asserted the statements should have been excluded. The Cole court rejected the claim, explaining: "This denial of defendant we think was competent and proper evidence to go to the jury for what it was worth. If the jury believed that defendant delivered the property, disclosed by the testimony of some three witnesses, then the fact that defendant denied the delivery was a circumstance tending to show that the delivery was not made innocently in his capacity as a salesman, but with intent to steal the property. If he had delivered the property innocently, the most natural thing for [44 Cal.3d 497] him to have done was to tell the truth about it. If he intended to steal it, the most natural thing for him to do when questioned about it was to lie concerning it. Deception, falsehood, and fabrications as to the facts of the case are treated as tending to show consciousness of guilt, and are admissible on the same theory as flight and concealment of the person when charged with crime." (Id., at pp. 89-90, 74 P. 547, italics added.) Thus, even though the falsity of the defendant's prior statement was not proved by its inconsistency with the defendant's subsequent testimony but by the testimony of other witnesses, the statement was found admissible.

Other Questions


Is it harmless beyond a reasonable doubt for a defendant to have admitted that they had made false statements in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant admit or deny statements made by a witness in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Can a self-represented defendant be found guilty of a criminal act against a criminal defendant under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a defendant has committed a criminal offence against a defendant in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Is a parent, relative, or co-habitant of a defendant in a criminal case outside the scope of marital privilege in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
Are there any cases where a trial court erred by admitting that a defendant made false statements during a search and seizure? (California, United States of America)
Can a criminal defendant refuse to stipulate or admit his way out of the full evidentiary force of the criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion for a mistrial in a criminal case where a defendant has admitted to a prior criminal record? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant admitted to admitting that he was a member of a criminal gang? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of abuse of discretion in a civil case where a declarant admitted making a false and misleading statement to a jury? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.