Are there any cases where a trial court erred by admitting that a defendant made false statements during a search and seizure?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Mendes, No. B216929, No. TA104016 (Cal. App. 2010):
Appellant contends that the trial court erred by admitting his statements because they were "made without a knowing and intelligent waiver of his Miranda rights." (Miranda v. Arizona, supra, 384 U.S. 436.) We disagree.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has successfully argued that the trial court erred by not admitting or excluding evidence about his alleged homeless status? (California, United States of America)
What if the trial court erred by admitting defendant's statements? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the trial court erred in admitting statements he made during police interrogation after he invoked his right to counsel? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court order a search of a defendant's computer and electronic devices in relation to a false imprisonment case involving a minor? (California, United States of America)
In a dual jury trial where two defendants have admitted extrajudicial statements against one defendant, what is the procedure in which one of the juries is to be excused? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court reverse the conviction of defendant in the second-degree murder trial of a man convicted of the crime of murder for making false statements about the crime scene? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have any grounds to argue that the trial court erred in failing to give the cautionary instruction at the end of trial? (California, United States of America)
