California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Scherer, A132585 (Cal. App. 2013):
Experimental evidence may be admitted if (1) it is relevant, (2) its conditions and those existing at the time of the alleged occurrence are shown to be substantially similar, and (3) the evidence will not consume undue time or confuse or mislead the jury. (People v. Bonin (1989) 47 Cal.3d 808, 847; People v. Boyd (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 541,
Page 65
565.) A trial court enjoys wide discretion in deciding whether to admit such evidence, and its decision is reviewed only for abuse of that discretion. (People v. Boyd, supra, 222 Cal.App.3d at p. 566.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.