The following excerpt is from United States v. Ray, 956 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2020):
We review "the district courts exclusion of expert testimony" for abuse of discretion. United States v. Christian , 749 F.3d 806, 810 (9th Cir. 2014). We first "consider whether the district court identified the correct legal standard for decision
[956 F.3d 1159]
of the issue before it" and then we "determine whether the district courts findings of fact, and its application of those findings of fact to the correct legal standard, were illogical, implausible, or without support in inferences that may be drawn from facts in the record." United States v. Hinkson , 585 F.3d 1247, 1251 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.