The following excerpt is from Ingram v. Acands, Inc., 977 F.2d 1332 (9th Cir. 1992):
We review a district court's evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion. Rogers v. Raymark Indus., 922 F.2d 1426, 1429 (9th Cir.1991). "In the area of admission of expert testimony, we will uphold the district court's decision unless that decision is 'manifestly erroneous.' " Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.