California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Brown, 2d Crim. No. B260000 (Cal. App. 2016):
"The determination of whether a continuance should be granted rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, although that discretion may not be exercised so as to deprive the defendant or his attorney of a reasonable opportunity to prepare." (People v. Sakarias (2000) 22 Cal.4th 596, 646.) While a pro se defendant must be given a reasonable opportunity to prepare a defense (People v. Maddox (1967) 67 Cal.2d 647, 652), a "'defendant who chooses to represent himself assumes the responsibilities inherent in the role which he has undertaken,' and 'is not entitled to special privileges not given an attorney. . . .' [Citations.]" (People v. Barnum (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1210, 1221.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.