Does defendant's voluntary absence operate to waive his constitutional right to be present at trial and permitted continuation of the trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Espinoza, 1 Cal.5th 61, 203 Cal.Rptr.3d 647, 373 P.3d 456 (Cal. 2016):

Of course, our conclusion that defendant's voluntary absence operated to waive his constitutional right to be present at trial and permitted continuation of the trial, does not end our inquiry regarding the propriety of the trial court's decision to proceed with the trial in the absence of defendant and defense counsel. Section 1043(b)(2) states that a defendant's voluntary absence shall not prevent the trial from continuing, but it does not require it. Accordingly, the decision whether to continue with a trial in absentia under the statute or to declare a mistrial rests within the discretion of the trial court. (Cf. Cureton v. United States, supra, 396 F.2d at p. 675 [similar language in

[1 Cal.5th 76]

Other Questions


Does defendant's voluntary absence operate to waive his constitutional right to be present at trial and permitted continuation of the trial? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant waives his right to be present at trial during the taking of evidence, can he show error of constitutional dimension? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant waives his right to be present at trial by refusing to leave the courtroom, does he have a right to remain in the courtroom? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to be personally present at trial if he is not personally present? (California, United States of America)
If defendant has no right to present the evidence at trial, has he not established a violation of his right to a fair trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have found that Defendant Joiner did not waive his assumed constitutional right to be personally present at the remand hearing and that the court erred in conducting that hearing in his absence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because the trial court relieved the prosecution of its burden of establishing that defendant acted with malice? (California, United States of America)
Does a capital defendant have to waive his right to be present at a trial where evidence is taken before the trier of fact? (California, United States of America)
Can a capital defendant waive his right to be personally present at trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Whitelogo nobg 300dpi sm


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."


Trusted by top litigators from across North America.