What is the test for a murder conviction when there is no time between the intention to kill and the act of killing?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Munoz, 157 Cal.App.3d 999, 204 Cal.Rptr. 271 (Cal. App. 1984):

"Since the decision in People v. Sanchez (1864), 24 Cal. 17, 30, it has been repeatedly declared that 'There need be no appreciable space of time between the intention to kill and the act of killing; they may be as instantaneous as successive thoughts of the mind,' but this is not the equivalent of saying that the intention to kill can be formed without being preceded by deliberation and premeditation. It is only a declaration that the act of killing may instantaneously follow the intention once the latter is finally formulated. It does not imply that mature reflection (deliberation and premeditation) need not precede the ultimate formation of the evil intention. By its very language it has reference only to the 'space of time between the intention to kill and the act of killing.' In other words, a murder is of the first degree no matter how quickly the act of killing follows the ultimate formation of the intention if that intention has been reached with deliberation and premeditation. This view of the law is manifest in the Sanchez case by the statement (at p. 30 of 24 Cal.) that 'The intent to kill must be the result of deliberate premeditation; it must be formed upon a pre-existing reflection, and not upon a sudden heat of passion sufficient to preclude the idea of deliberation.' Neither the

Page 284

STANIFORTH, Associate Justice, concurring and dissenting.

Other Questions


Can a defendant charged with the murder or attempted murder of an intended target also be convicted of the murder of other, nontargeted persons? (California, United States of America)
What is the range of life sentences for a convicted violent criminal who was convicted of assault with intent to murder, assault, and possession of a firearm under the Mental Health Act? (California, United States of America)
Can the felony-murder rule be applied to a charge of assault and murder in a case where appellant entered the home with intent to commit assault or murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to convict a defendant of first-degree murder where malice was not the intent to kill in the absence of sudden quarrel or heat of passion? (California, United States of America)
Is there a requirement that the perpetrator entertain the intent to kill for either the offense of felony murder or the robbery-felony-murder special circumstance? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of attempted murder (or voluntary manslaughter) if his intent was either to kill or to kill everyone on the dance floor? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting a murder if the actual perpetrator of the same murder is convicted of murder? (California, United States of America)
Does intent to kill constitute an element of the prior-murder conviction special circumstance? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court reverse the conviction of defendant in the second-degree murder trial of a man convicted of the crime of murder for making false statements about the crime scene? (California, United States of America)
Does a convicted felon who has completed his sentence for a conviction for a felonies conviction under Proposition 47 of the California Criminal Code, who would have been convicted of a misdemeanor under this act if this act had not been in effect? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.