The following excerpt is from I.F. v. J.S., 62 Misc.3d 743, 89 N.Y.S.3d 828 (N.Y. Cty. Ct. 2018):
Even if the Respondent father's motion were timely under CPLR Rule 5015(a)(1), in order to prevail, the father would have had to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default in opposing the application for modification of the support order and to demonstrate the existence of a potentially meritorious defense to that application. Proctor-Shields v. Shields , 74 A.D.3d 1347, 1348, 904 N.Y.S.2d 183 (2d Dept. 2010). The Respondent father has failed to make this showing.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.