What is the test for a jury to find that a defendant intended to kill while lying in wait?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Webster, 285 Cal.Rptr. 31, 54 Cal.3d 411, 814 P.2d 1273 (Cal. 1991):

22 In any event, the jury necessarily found defendant intended to kill when it found true a special circumstance that defendant "intentionally killed ... while lying in wait." (See People v. Sedeno, supra, 10 Cal.3d 703, 721, 112 Cal.Rptr. 1, 518 P.2d 913.)

Other Questions


What is the difference between lying in wait first degree murder and the lying in-wait special circumstance? (California, United States of America)
If evidence supports the special-circumstance finding of lying in wait, does that necessarily support the first degree murder verdict based on the theory of lying-in-wait? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of a lying-in-wait murder based on the fact that he was standing in front of his victim while waiting in the car? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of a lying-in-wait murder based on the fact that he was standing in front of his victim while waiting for his victim? (California, United States of America)
If evidence supports the special-circumstance finding of lying in wait, does that necessarily support the first degree murder verdict based on the theory of lying-in-wait? (California, United States of America)
Does the amendment to the lying-in-wait special circumstance in a murder case in which there is a distinction between the special circumstance and lying in-wait first degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant to be found guilty of lying in wait? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to convict a defendant of murder by means of lying in wait? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of a court finding that a motion brought by Attorney Defendants against Defendant Kendall was "frivolous and/or intended to harass"? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.