What is the test for a jury to convict a defendant beyond a reasonable doubt?

reasonable, credible, and of solid value from which a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.' [Citation.] We determine 'whether... any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.' [Citation.] In so doing, [we] 'presume[] in support of the judgment the existence of every fact the trier could reasonably deduce from the evidence.' [Citation.]" (People v. Avila (2009) 46 Cal.4th 680, 701.)