Is evidence sufficient to convict a defendant beyond a reasonable doubt?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Guerrero, D069072 (Cal. App. 2016):
evidence may be sufficient to connect a defendant with the crime and to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.' " (People v. Thomas (1992) 2 Cal.4th 489, 514 (Thomas).)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for establishing sufficient evidence to convict a defendant beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Can substantial evidence be sufficient to convict a defendant beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there is substantial evidence by which a reasonable trier of fact could find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the entire record disclose evidence from which a reasonable trier of fact could find beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant Lopez premeditated and deliberated? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury interpret the instructions of a jury as permitting a conviction on a standard less than beyond beyond beyond the reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the absence of lingering doubt from a recitation of evidence the defense offered in an attempt to raise reasonable doubt raise a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of reasonable doubt apply to a defendant's due process right to appeal against a jury verdict that diminished the prosecution's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's error in admitting evidence of a defendant's inconsistent testimony in the prosecution's case in chief, rather than for impeachment purposes, be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor ask prospective jurors whether they would vote to convict if he proved defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to convict a defendant beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
