What is the test for a jury to be instructed on a defense supported by minimal and insubstantial evidence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Ramirez, D070013 (Cal. App. 2017):

warrant instructions should be resolved in favor of the accused." (People v. Wilson (1967) 66 Cal.2d 749, 763.) However, a "jury instruction need not be given whenever any evidence is presented, no matter how weak. [Citation.] Rather, the accused must present 'evidence sufficient to deserve consideration by the jury, i.e., evidence from which a jury composed of reasonable [people] could have concluded that the particular facts underlying the instruction did exist.' " (People v. Strozier (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 55, 63.) Put differently, "a trial court has no obligation to instruct sua sponte on a defense supported by 'minimal and insubstantial' evidence." (People v. Barnett (1998) 17 Cal.4th 1044, 1152.)

Other Questions


What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
Is there substantial evidence to support the instruction that a judge must only give the instruction which is supported by substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure to instruct sua sponte on a lesser included offense that is supported by the evidence that supports the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there sufficient evidence to support appellant's claim that insufficient evidence supports his claim that he was convicted of failing to follow an instruction? (California, United States of America)
Is a federal or state law error for failing to instruct on a requested affirmative defense instruction supported by substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have to consider whether a jury has been instructed to disregard an instruction from the Court of Appeal that is not supported by how the jury views the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the duty of a court to instruct on a defense if it is supported by substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury's failure to instruct on a defense that is supported by substantial evidence require reversal? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.