Is a failure to instruct sua sponte on a lesser included offense that is supported by the evidence that supports the evidence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Cordova, A150985, A154004 (Cal. App. 2018):

The failure to instruct sua sponte on a lesser included offense that is supported by the evidence is a state law error, requiring reversal of a conviction only when it is reasonably probable that the error affected the outcome of the proceeding. (People v. Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 165.) The failure to instruct regarding general principles of law pertaining to the use of force to perform an official duty deprived Cordova of a potential defense to the crimes at issue on appeal. It is not clear whether this state law error also implicates the federal constitution requiring reversal unless the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. (See People v. Salas (2006) 37 Cal.4th 967, 984.)

Other Questions


What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
Is there substantial evidence to support the instruction that a judge must only give the instruction which is supported by substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that was assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court's failure to instruct a sponte on a lesser included offense need to be reviewed de novo? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that is assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that was assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for applying the independent or de novo standard of review to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that is assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of a court's failure to instruct sua sponte on a lesser included offense in a noncapital case? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure to instruct a jury on a lesser included offense in a non capital case require reversal? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.