California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Nichandros v. Real Estate Division of Dept. of Inv., 181 Cal.App.2d 179, 5 Cal.Rptr. 274 (Cal. App. 1960):
Appellant next urges that there is no substantial evidence to support the finding that he made the misrepresentations of fact knowingly or intentionally. Since knowledge and intent are matters largely within the mind of the person charged, it frequently happens that direct evidence is unavailable. The trier of fact must view the circumstances surrounding the transaction as well as the statements themselves to determine the truth of the charges. In Gagne v. Bertran, 43 Cal.2d 481, the following appears at page 487, 275 P.2d 15, 20:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.