What is the test for a defendant's right to speedy trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Jackson v. Superior Court, 230 Cal.App.3d 1391, 281 Cal.Rptr. 545 (Cal. App. 1991):

The right to speedy trial is a fundamental right designed " 'to protect those accused of crime against possible delay, caused either by willful oppression, or the neglect of the state or its officers.' " (Jones v. Superior Court (1970) 3 Cal.3d 734, 738, 91 Cal.Rptr. 578, 478 P.2d 10.) A defendant's right to speedy trial cannot be stifled by procrastination or neglect by public officials. (Sykes v. Superior Court (1973) 9 Cal.3d 83, 94, 106 Cal.Rptr. 786, 507 P.2d 90.)

1. The Proposed Plea Bargain

Other Questions


Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant who fails to make a prior demand for a speedy trial have a right to speedy trial? (California, United States of America)
If defendant has no right to present the evidence at trial, has he not established a violation of his right to a fair trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to make a prior demand for a speedy trial as a condition for consideration of a motion for speedy trial? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1387 of the Penal Code, which permits refiling a felony complaint after dismissal, deprive defendants of the right to a speedy trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because the trial court relieved the prosecution of its burden of establishing that defendant acted with malice? (California, United States of America)
How has the trial court treated the waiver of a defendant's right to stand trial by jury? (California, United States of America)
Does a deputy district attorney acquiesce in having the motion heard during the trial of a defendant before trial, rather than prior to trial? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant's voluntary absence operate to waive his constitutional right to be present at trial and permitted continuation of the trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.