What is the test for a defendant's right to access expert testimony at trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mendez, B255338 (Cal. App. 2017):

The Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant the due process right to present witnesses in support of a defense, but that right is "'subject to reasonable restrictions.'" (People v. Mickel (2016) 2 Cal.5th 181, 218.) The rules of evidence are reasonable restrictions on those rights and thus generally "'do not impermissibly infringe on the accused's right to present a defense.'" (Ibid.) Similarly, "the right to effective assistance of counsel encompasses entitlement to defense experts" when they are necessary for a "fair trial on the issue of guilt." (People v. Stuckey (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 898, 918.) This right, however, is also subject to the reasonable restrictions in the Evidence Code. (See ibid.)

Page 12

Other Questions


Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that expert testimony may be available at trial require defense counsel to consult the experts or present their testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court reject appellant's assertion that expert testimony at trial violated his due process rights and rendered his trial fundamentally unfair? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
If defendant has no right to present the evidence at trial, has he not established a violation of his right to a fair trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is represented by counsel during the first part of a criminal trial invoke his right to self-representation mid-trial? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant's voluntary absence operate to waive his constitutional right to be present at trial and permitted continuation of the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because the trial court relieved the prosecution of its burden of establishing that defendant acted with malice? (California, United States of America)
Does a deputy district attorney acquiesce in having the motion heard during the trial of a defendant before trial, rather than prior to trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion when it denied a defendant's motion to exclude the testimony of Page 35 of the Defendant's lawyer as more prejudicial than probative? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.