What is the substantial evidence standard of review for assault and domestic violence convictions?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Aldrete, E058885 (Cal. App. 2015):

Under the substantial evidence standard of review, "'"the power of an appellate court begins and ends with the determination as to whether, on the entire record, there is substantial evidence, contradicted or uncontradicted, which will support the determination. . . ."'" (People v. Peterson (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1072, 1085.) "'"We do not reweigh or reinterpret the evidence; rather, we determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the inference drawn by the trier of fact." [Citation.]' [Citation.] We must presume in support of the judgment the existence of every fact the trier could reasonably deduce from the evidence, whether the evidence is direct or circumstantial. [Citation.] If the circumstances reasonably justify the trier of fact's findings, the judgment may not be reversed simply because the circumstances might also reasonably be reconciled with a contrary finding. [Citations.]" (Ibid.)

This court cannot reevaluate or reinterpret the evidence. (People v. Peterson, supra, 211 Cal.App.4th at p. 1085.) Accordingly, we deny defendant's request for an objective reevaluation of the evidence. Since defendant has raised a substantial evidence issue, we will briefly explain why the evidence is sufficient to support the assault and domestic violence convictions.

Page 7

Assault "'requires an intentional act and actual knowledge of those facts sufficient to establish that the act by its nature will probably and directly result in the application of physical force against another.' [Citation.] 'The mens rea [for assault] is established upon proof the defendant willfully committed an act that by its nature will probably and directly result in injury to another, i.e., a battery. Although the defendant must intentionally engage in conduct that will likely produce injurious consequences, the prosecution need not prove a specific intent to inflict a particular harm. . . .'" (People v. Golde (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 101, 108, fn. omitted.)

Other Questions


What is the test for a finding of substantial evidence under a substantial evidence standard of review? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard of review in a sexual assault case when the prosecution case is based on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard of review when a defendant challenges his conviction for insufficient evidence on appeal? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction of a convicted rapist, does the court have to review the evidence in the context of section 1118.1? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for a jury to consider an allegation of domestic violence against a defendant who has not been charged with domestic violence under the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a police officer make an arrest for domestic violence under section 836 of the California Domestic Violence Act if the victim is assaulted by her partner while they are not married? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence test in the review of a finding under the preponderance of the evidence standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard of review applied to challenges to the sufficiency of evidence in a juvenile proceeding involving criminal behavior? (California, United States of America)
What is substantial evidence applied for a substantial evidence application to review whether an employer failed to pay a certain amount of wages? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for review of a conviction for assault and robbery, in what circumstances will the Court uphold the conviction of defendant as a result of insufficient evidence to support the judgment? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.