What is the standard of review in the context of a criminal case involving direct evidence against a defendant?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Casados, B283201 (Cal. App. 2018):
conviction]." [Citation.]' " (People v. Hughes (2002) 27 Cal.4th 287, 370.) This standard of review applies to claims involving both direct and circumstantial evidence. (People v. Manibusan (2013) 58 Cal.4th 40, 87.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the substantial evidence standard of review applied to challenges to the sufficiency of evidence in a juvenile proceeding involving criminal behavior? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence, what is the standard of review in the context of a claim for insufficient evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, what is the standard of review required by the California Court of Appeal to determine whether the evidence is sufficient? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a sexual assault case involving both direct and circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What standard of review applies to a criminal defendant's claim that insufficient evidence supports a conviction? (California, United States of America)
Can a self-represented defendant be found guilty of a criminal act against a criminal defendant under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for insufficient evidence claims involving circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a sexual assault claim involving both direct and circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, how does the Court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence support his criminal conviction, what is the standard of review used by this court? (California, United States of America)
